There has been a tendency for visitor studies to use quantitative methods, such as questionnaires and visitor counts, for short-term surveys to look at the visiting patterns, visitor expectations and satisfaction, and the impact of messaging (e.g. Buckham 2013a; Figure 107). More recently, a small number of studies have employed more qualitative methods of assessment, such as in-depth interviews, participant observation and observational tracking, over an extended period of time. This research has produced a far deeper understanding of why people respond to heritage in the ways they do and some of the factors underlying different communities’ responses (e.g. Jones 2004; McClanahan 2004).
In This Section:
Thematic
- Marine & Maritime
- Archaeological Science
- Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site: The Antonine Wall
- Future Thinking on Carved Stones in Scotland
- Acknowledgements
- Carved Stones Executive Summary
- Dedication to John Higgitt
- Listen to the Stones Downloads
- 1. Introduction Carved Stones
- 2. Current state of knowledge
- 3. Creating Knowledge and Understanding
- 4. Understanding value
- 5. Securing for the future
- 6. Engaging and Experiencing
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 Ways of engaging
- 6.2.1 Through better understanding of values
- 6.2.2 Through understanding audiences
- 6.2.3 Through targeted interpretation
- 6.2.4 Through encouraging creativity
- 6.2.5 Through presentation and displays
- 6.2.6 Through visitor studies
- 6.2.7 Through education
- 6.2.8 Through information management and access
- 6.2.9 Through volunteering
- 6.3 Research recommendations
- 7. Looking forward
- 8. Carved Stone Workshop Documentation
- 9. Bibliography
- 10. Published Sources
- List of Abbreviations
- Future Thinking on Carved Stones in Scotland: Case Studies
- Boyne to Brodgar: Making Monuments, Creating Communities
- Scottish Network for Nineteenth-Century European Cultures