This section presents the agenda themes for the Neolithic in Perth and Kinross. Some are nested under the overarching PKARF theme headings, aimed at addressing wider multi-period priorities, while others are period-based and specific to the scope of this chapter. Where appropriate, a short explanatory note is provided, detailing underlying period-based thematic priorities which is then followed by the research questions generated to address them.
Environment
Although valuable palaeoenvironmental work has been carried out as part of landscape and site-based investigations, clarity is still lacking on the overall palaeoenvironmental context (including climate) of the region’s Neolithic. The reliance on timber and other woodland resources in Neolithic lifeways is evident (Noble 2017), but there is much to learn about how these resources were obtained and used, what technologies were deployed and what evidence there is for impact on or stewardship of woodland. A better understanding of human / climate interactions is needed.
PKARF Agenda 3.1: More palaeoenvironmental work is required on Neolithic sites in the region in order to answer many research questions.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7060a7e4More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Agenda 3.2: Explore the potential to develop prehistoric tree-ring chronologies in Perth and Kinross for archaeological dating, climate record and other palaeoenvironmental applications
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7060c104More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.1: What is the palaeoenvironmental context for Perth and Kinross’ Neolithic?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d81014More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.2: How did the environment change over the course of the Neolithic?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d825ddMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.3: What is the relationship between humans and woodlands in Neolithic Perth and Kinross and how does that change through space and time?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d83291More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.4: How were woodlands used, impacted upon, stewarded (if at all) during the Neolithic and what wood technologies were in use?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d83be5More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.5: What potential is there to develop prehistoric tree-ring chronologies in Perth and Kinross for archaeological dating, climate record and other palaeoenvironmental applications?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d843d5More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkUpland / Lowland Relationships
The upland Neolithic remains poorly understood with relatively few modern excavations having been undertaken. More needs to be known about the chronology of funerary and other ceremonial monuments and potentially Neolithic earthworks and hilltop enclosures which remain unexplored. Thought processes as followed by Loveday (2016) have proved effective and could be applied here even prior to fieldwork, with an upland Neolithic survey providing an opportunity to answer key questions.
PKARF Agenda 3.3: There is a need to locate and investigate settlement and subsistence activities in upland areas where field walking may be limited.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7060cb60More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Agenda 3.4: More needs to be known about the chronology of funerary and other ceremonial monuments and potentially Neolithic earthworks and hilltop enclosures which remain unexplored.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7060d5b5More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Agenda 3.5: Undertake an upland Neolithic survey.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7060dee5More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.6: To what extent can significant differences in Neolithic practices, traditions and settlement patterns be identified between the upland and lowland areas of Perth and Kinross and how might such differences be explained?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d84d0dMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.7: To what extent, if at all, do hilltop enclosures relate to Neolithic activity and what do they tell us about lifeways and practices in this period?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d857b3More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.8: To what extent is the apparent upland/lowland divide influenced by differential preservation and visibility of archaeological remains?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d86570More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPeriods of Transition
The traditional approach to characterising the past in terms of periods (ie Mesolithic, Neolithic, Chalcolithic etc) has its limitations, especially with regard to defining and explaining the transition from one period to the next. As far as the Neolithic to Chalcolithic transition is concerned, for example, a perspective that considers developments in the centuries before and after the first appearance of the ‘Beaker phenomenon’ might help us to understand better the context in which changes were occurring, the impact of Continental influences (including new people) and the response to them. Following the approach taken by Younger (2015), one potentially fruitful approach might be to focus attention on henges, since in several cases they are known to have been constructed during the second half of the third millennium BC in places where earlier monuments, dating to the first half of the third millennium BC, had existed.
PKARF Agenda 3.6: The transition from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic is an important but poorly understood topic, driven in partly due to limited Mesolithic evidence, and requires further study.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7060e975More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Agenda 3.7: More work is needed on the 3rd millennium BC and the poorly understood transition from the Neolithic to the Chalcolithic.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7060f84dMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.9: When did farming arrive in Perth and Kinross?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d87001More information:
We know people were farming at Claish as early as around 3700 BC, but were farmers present in Perth and Kinross much before then?Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.10: What was the relationship between Mesolithic and Neolithic communities in the region?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d87b67More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.11: How long did the Mesolithic hunting-fishing-foraging lifestyle continue after the first farmers appeared?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d88c75More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.12: What evidence exists to support a theory of Mesolithic ways of life ending as a result of hunter-fisher-foragers becoming acculturated to a farming lifestyle?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d8a03dMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.13: What does the transition between the Neolithic and Chalcolithic look like, and when – and over how long – did it occur?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d8ad73More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.14: What was the chronological overlap in the use of Grooved Ware and Beaker pottery in Perth and Kinross?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d8b90fMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.15: How many Beaker-using Continental immigrants arrived in Perth and Kinross, and why did they come to this part of Scotland?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d8c54dMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.16: What was the impact of the Continental influences, including the new technology of using metal, on the resident Neolithic communities and how did they respond to their arrival?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d8e0f2More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkCropmarks
The region’s cropmark record is of significant importance for understanding the monument landscape of this period and this has been clearly demonstrated through recent research such as the SERF Project. Although valuable work has been carried out, further synthesis and characterisation of the cropmark record is still needed and the potentially Neolithic structures that have been identified, such as by Millican (2016a, 2016b), require further assessment and ground-truthing.
PKARF Agenda 3.8: The region’s cropmark record is of significant importanct and further synthesis and characterisation of the cropmark record is needed.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7061012bMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Agenda 3.9: Neolithic structures that have been identified through cropmarks, such as by Millican (2016a, 2016b), require further assessment and ground-truthing.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c70610b5aMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.17: How can an evaluation of all cropmark sites that might be Neolithic assist in our understanding of the monument landscape of the region?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d8f0f4More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.18: What can an evaluation of lessons learned from prior excavations of cropmarks in the Region, and beyond, tell us about Perth and Kinross’s Neolithic?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d8fc41More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.19: To what extent would re-assessing and better characterising the cropmark record in Perth and Kinross more generally and in light of excavations, expand our understanding of the Neolithic of the region?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d908a8More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.20: Which, if any, of the region’s cropmark sites, which bear a resemblance to causewayed enclosures, date to the Neolithic?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d91f1cMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkSettlements and Timber ‘Square-in-circle’ Structures
Priority 1: There is a need to improve our current poor understanding of Neolithic settlements and how they changed over time. For example, what was the architecture of houses that succeeded the Claish ‘hall’, particularly at sites where only pits are found? There is currently very little evidence for domestic timber structures across the region with knowledge largely dependent on pits and cropmarks.
Priority 2: The record for the Middle Neolithic (around 3500–3000 BC) is particularly thin. Recent developer-funded discoveries and cropmark identifications offer potential targets and present opportunities for focusing future research. A systematic fieldwalking campaign, akin to that employed by Phillips in Strathtay in 1994 (Phillips and Bradley 2005), could help to identify settlement sites and contextualise the cropmark record while also encouraging community participation and skills training. It may also aid identification of lowland late Mesolithic sites. Ground-truthing by excavation following fieldwalking would be key to capitalising on the information gathered (cf Barclay and Wickham-Jones 2002).
PKARF Agenda 3.10: Carry out a systematic fieldwalking campaign assist in the identification of settlements and of individual domestic structures?
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c70611486More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Agenda 3.11: Carry out an assessment of lithic collections already held in museums.
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c70611d31More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.21: What kinds of house structure were used during the Neolithic?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d9310cMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.22: How did domestic architecture and the size, organisation, temporality and distribution of settlements change over the course of the Neolithic?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d94aeeMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.23: What can be said about the domestic structures that had probably existed at sites where the only surviving evidence is in the form of pits and artefact scatters?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d95b39More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.24: When considering the site of Haughs of Pittentian (MPK18545), can any of the timber ‘circle-and-square’ structures of the Late Neolithic (and possibly Middle Neolithic) be confidently interpreted as houses, as has been claimed?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d96a60More information:
If so, then were they roofed? If timber ‘square -in-circles were ‘great houses’ then where did the ordinary people live or were these non-domestic special structures, roofed or otherwise?Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.25: What was the architecture of houses that succeeded the Claish ‘hall’, particularly at sites where only pits are found?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d975c3More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkEconomy, social organisation, material culture and patterns of resource use
Priority 1: Only a vague sense of the agricultural and animal husbandry regime exists and of what wild resources were consumed during the Neolithic in Perth and Kinross.
Priority 2: There is a need to better understand the nature of social organisation and its possible changes over the course of the Neolithic in this part of Scotland.
Priority 3: Our understanding of the Middle Neolithic pottery in Perth and Kinross is constrained by its paucity.
Priority 4: Greater understanding is required concerning the use of resources and the changing patterns of connectivity linking the Neolithic inhabitants of Perth and Kinross with each other and with people elsewhere. In particular, it would be useful to find out whether any English (probably Yorkshire) flint arrived in this part of Scotland prior to 3000 BC.
PKARF Agenda 3.13: What strategy could be used to locate further sites containing Middle Neolithic Impressed Ware and Late Neolithic Grooved Ware pottery?
More information on this strategy
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/strategy/strategy-6298c7061342aMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2022Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.26: Beyond a probably early cessation of cultivation of bread wheat, in what other ways did the subsistence strategy change over the course of the Neolithic?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d99398More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.27: What was the nature of social organisation in Perth and Kinross, and how (if at all) did it change over the course of the Neolithic?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d99e8cMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.28: What can we infer about social organisation from the large Late Neolithic palisaded enclosures and timber ‘square-in-circle’ structures?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d9b6e3More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.29: To what extent can the cursus monuments, bank barrow/s and hybrid cursus/bank barrows be interpreted in terms of activities at a tribal level?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d9c1b8More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.30: How do the Middle Neolithic Impressed Ware and Late Neolithic Grooved Ware of Perth and Kinross compare with their counterparts elsewhere in Scotland and in Britain more widely?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d9cc3dMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.31: What further can be understood about the chronology of exploitation of calc-silicate hornfels at Creag na Caillich?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d9d633More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.32: What evidence exists for the arrival of English (probably Yorkshire) flint in Perth and Kinross prior to around 3000 BC?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d9efc3More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.33: What is the overall picture of stone exploitation as reflected in the stone axeheads found in the region? In other words, what proportion of all axeheads that have been found belong to ‘Grouped’ rock types?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103d9faafMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkMonuments, funerary practices and enclosures
Priority 1: The chronology and associated funerary practices of monument types such as long mounds, cursus monuments and bank barrows remain poorly understood. A wider assessment of the potential for further Early Neolithic round barrows is also required.
Priority 2: Greater clarity of the chronology and form of the Cleaven Dyke (MPK6611) is required, including whether its north-west end consisted of a long barrow with an oval barrow adjacent to it.
Priority 3: Very little is known about the funerary practices of the Late Neolithic users of Grooved Ware pottery. For example, the Forteviot cemetery (MPK1888) featuring deposits of cremated remains was not associated with this kind of pottery.
Priority 4: It still remains unclear as to whether there are any Neolithic causewayed enclosures in Perth and Kinross and how many Neolithic enclosures of any type there are in this region.
Priority 5: It is unclear whether any standing stones, stone circles or other orthostatic stone settings (apart from the Forteviot standing stone) were erected in Perth and Kinross during the Neolithic.
PKARF Qu 3.34: What funerary practices were associated with the builders of Early Neolithic long mounds in the region and how do they compare to those found in similar monuments elsewhere?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da0f7aMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.35: What evidence exists for cursus monuments or bank barrows being used for the laying out or burial of the dead?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da1c6dMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.36: Over what date range were long mounds, cursus monuments and bank barrows constructed?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da2891More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.37: In how many cases were cursus monuments built onto pre-existing Early Neolithic long mounds?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da345fMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.38: When was the Cleaven Dyke constructed, and could the application of techniques such as OSL dating provide new information?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da3faeMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.39: What evidence is there for the north-west end of the Cleaven Dyke actually being an Early Neolithic long barrow, and for an oval barrow adjacent to it?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da4bf3More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.40: What evidence is there for the presence of Neolithic causewayed enclosures in Perth and Kinross?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da5572More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.41: How many Neolithic enclosures are there in this region, when were they constructed and how were they used?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da5dcdMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.42: What was the nature of Middle Neolithic funerary practices?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da6818More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.43: What was the nature of Late Neolithic funerary practices associated with the users of Grooved Ware pottery?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da795eMore information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkPKARF Qu 3.44: What evidence exists for the erection of standing stones (other than the Forteviot cemetery-marker stone), stone circles or stone settings during the Neolithic in Perth and Kinross?
More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6296103da8341More information:
Status:
ActiveAuthority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022Date of next review:
01/06/2025Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research FrameworkRock Art
Priority 1: The region has a rich rock art record, but its chronology is unclear. Further work is required to acquire dating evidence for the lifecycle of decorated stones and practices associated with them.
Priority 2: Rock art requires better integration into the narratives of the period where it can contribute more effectively to the understanding of the Neolithic in both the uplands and lowlands.