6.10.1 Environment

Priority 1: Archaeobotanical studies

Little is known about early medieval crop husbandry, agriculture practices and plant exploitation within the region, as until recently early medieval settlements have remained elusive. The discovery and excavation of sites, such as at Lair, Glen Shee (Strachan et al 2020) and Bertha Park (Engl 2020), and the corn-drying kiln at Kinross High School (Hastie in Cachart 2008) offer the opportunity for enhanced sampling for macroplant / archaeobotanical remains to inform our understanding of early medieval crop processing, agricultural practices and use of wild plants (see PKARF section 9.4 Archaeobotany). Sampling of any charred or waterlogged material from in-situ early medieval settlement remains / sites, should be a priority, with samples targeting deposits offering potential for the preservation of early medieval archaeobotanical / macroplant remains.

Priority 2: Dendrochronology

The Perth and Kinross area has potential to develop long native tree-ring chronologies including the early medieval period. Some surviving oak timber of the period has been identified from Loch Tay and Dundurn. Every opportunity should be taken to recover samples for dendrochronological analysis to develop tree-ring chronologies for this key region (Mills 2021). A successful tree-ring chronology would offer precision dating of to a year, as well as an annual climate record, woodland impact insights and other valuable environmental data. The development of such chronologies for Perth and Kinross is likely to depend upon accumulating data from a combination of archaeological and natural sub-fossil material, as has been achieved for native Scots pine further north, principally around the Cairngorms, though with some long-lived pine living tree data already collected from Perth and Kinross to start that process for pine here (Wilson et al 2011; Rydval et al 2017; Mills 2021). Oak is the timber species most likely to be encountered archaeologically and probably has the greatest promise for long chronology development and archaeological dating applications in the area, although other species including pine, alder, ash and elm also have potential and should not be dismissed. The Fortingall Yew signals the association between ancient trees and early medieval church sites which could be further investigated across Perth and Kinross.

Priority 3: Zooarchaeology

The available zooarchaeological evidence from lowland sites is scarce; and only slightly less so for the uplands. With new insights from elsewhere to draw upon, such as the Northern Picts, there is scope to explore this area further. New techniques, such as multi-isotope analysis, are available as new sites are investigated, or as previously ‘lost’ assemblages are reviewed, such those from Alcock’s excavations at Dundurn which are currently being dated by Aberdeen University.

Priority 4: Geoarchaeology

Inorganic phosphate analysis offers significant potential to understand domestic farming settlements (Banks 1996) and are particularly valuable in understanding turf-built Pitcarmick-type byre-houses. Ongoing PhD geoarchaeological research into occupation layers from Lair (Reid forthcoming) has highlighted the value of assessments of pH, electrical conductivity, magnetic susceptibility, organic matter content, multi-element analysis and micromorphology. It has been designed to identify activity areas within structures and characterise the post-depositional processes and offers significant opportunity for future research (see PKARF Section 9.3 Geoarchaeology).

Research Questions

PKARF Qu 6.1: What differences can be identified, if any, between the later prehistoric and early medieval periods in terms of crops cultivated, farming practices, including animal husbandry and foods gathered?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f94b14
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.2: What evidence is there for the introduction of new plants and can this identify new trade links during this period?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f95ea6
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.3: What differences can be identified between the crops cultivated and agricultural practices between lowland and upland areas within the region, including any differences in stock and manuring practices?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f96641
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.4: How can long tree-ring chronologies, including for the early medieval period, be developed in Perth and Kinross – for archaeological dating applications and the provision of annually resolved climate and environmental data?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f96e25
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.5: Is there an association between ancient yew, and other trees, and early medieval church sites in the area? Can scientific techniques including dendrochronology assist in confirming this association?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f976a8
More information:
What arboreal practices led to the preservation of certain trees or groups of trees?
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.6: Can we locate more sites of early medieval date in the lowlands?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f97ea8
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.7: Can some faunal remains of this period be considered as ritual deposits?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f9867c
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.8: Can the re-evaluation of museum collections, for example, Hurly Hawkin, Angus, provide insights relevant to Perth and Kinross.

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f98e72
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.9: To what extent can episodes of abandonment and reoccupation/reuse be observed in the early medieval structural record?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f99642
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.10: To what extent can geoarchaeological techniques such as phosphate surveys enable  the identification of settlement?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f99e5a
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.11: Is the general lack of floor layers observed across early medieval structures the result of natural or anthropogenic processes?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f9a717
More information:
There are considerable gaps in the published Pitcarmick archive, including section drawings/photographs and the results (if any) of the micromorphological blocks taken. The digitisation of the outstanding material would aid comparative studies and interpretation.
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories:

PKARF Qu 6.12: Can analysis of human dietscapes evidenced through multi-isotope studies  be extended to animals in order to determine where domestic livestock were raised as opposed to where they were consumed? Can oxygen and strontium isotopes in animal teeth provide evidence of the geographical point of origin as per Czére et al 2021?

More information on this question
URI:
https://scarf.scot/researchframework/v1/question/question-6308df2f9b0a3
More information:
Status:
Active
Authority to change status:
Date accepted:
01/06/2022
Date of next review:
01/06/2025
Linked Strategy(s):
Found in the following Frameworks:
The Scottish Archaeological Research Framework
Categories: